<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube does 3D!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moshblog.me.uk/2010/02/08/youtube-does-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moshblog.me.uk/2010/02/08/youtube-does-3d/</link>
	<description>--**-- The Blog Without A Bloody Annoying Tagline --**--</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:04:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mosh</title>
		<link>http://www.moshblog.me.uk/2010/02/08/youtube-does-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7609</link>
		<dc:creator>Mosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moshblog.me.uk/?p=2513#comment-7609</guid>
		<description>The cross-eyed one is tricky - like those silly posters that were all the rage about 15 years ago. Once you get it, you have it nailed but it&#039;s not easy to get.

I did actually find a program on a website the other day that created 3D images using animated GIF! You needed two photos taken about 4&quot; apart, then the program layered them and made them alternate. OK, so the image very visibly wobbled but the 3D effect was impressive.

You&#039;re right about the &quot;next big thing&quot; thing. 3D is superb in the IMAX, but pretty ropey on a normal cinema screen. And I don&#039;t get the current push for rugby and football in 3D. Lower the ticket prices and get more people into the grounds if they want realism!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cross-eyed one is tricky &#8211; like those silly posters that were all the rage about 15 years ago. Once you get it, you have it nailed but it&#8217;s not easy to get.</p>
<p>I did actually find a program on a website the other day that created 3D images using animated GIF! You needed two photos taken about 4&#8243; apart, then the program layered them and made them alternate. OK, so the image very visibly wobbled but the 3D effect was impressive.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about the &#8220;next big thing&#8221; thing. 3D is superb in the IMAX, but pretty ropey on a normal cinema screen. And I don&#8217;t get the current push for rugby and football in 3D. Lower the ticket prices and get more people into the grounds if they want realism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.moshblog.me.uk/2010/02/08/youtube-does-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7608</link>
		<dc:creator>David Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moshblog.me.uk/?p=2513#comment-7608</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get the cross-eyed method to work at all... but then not sure what to do exactly. Are there instructions somewhere? However, the red/cyan version works reasonably well.

I remain unconvinced that 3D will be the next big thing that the industry tells us it will be. All this faffing about with glasses or going cross-eyed is more trouble than it&#039;s worth when you just want to sit down and watch something. I can see it would be useful for some niche applications, e.g. product design, or perhaps some games but not for general entertainment. 

However, I&#039;ve been wrong before... for example, I still don&#039;t have the personal jet pack that I was conviced I&#039;d have by the year 2000!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get the cross-eyed method to work at all&#8230; but then not sure what to do exactly. Are there instructions somewhere? However, the red/cyan version works reasonably well.</p>
<p>I remain unconvinced that 3D will be the next big thing that the industry tells us it will be. All this faffing about with glasses or going cross-eyed is more trouble than it&#8217;s worth when you just want to sit down and watch something. I can see it would be useful for some niche applications, e.g. product design, or perhaps some games but not for general entertainment. </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve been wrong before&#8230; for example, I still don&#8217;t have the personal jet pack that I was conviced I&#8217;d have by the year 2000!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mosh</title>
		<link>http://www.moshblog.me.uk/2010/02/08/youtube-does-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7535</link>
		<dc:creator>Mosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moshblog.me.uk/?p=2513#comment-7535</guid>
		<description>Which I don&#039;t have. Grr. Hmm, wonder if we have any Quality Street and some cardboard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which I don&#8217;t have. Grr. Hmm, wonder if we have any Quality Street and some cardboard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almost witty</title>
		<link>http://www.moshblog.me.uk/2010/02/08/youtube-does-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator>almost witty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moshblog.me.uk/?p=2513#comment-7534</guid>
		<description>Works quite well with those 3D glasses that were given away for Channel 4&#039;s 3D week, if you set the YouTube to amber/purple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works quite well with those 3D glasses that were given away for Channel 4&#8242;s 3D week, if you set the YouTube to amber/purple&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

