See it if you like: Formula 1. Or in fact, even if you don’t. It’s worth a watch either way.
I am not an F1 fan. I appreciate the technology and so forth, but I find the sport itself deathly dull. The only way you could make F1 more boring would be to take out all the corners. Well done, America, with your NASCAR nonsense. Seriously, an oval?
However, I really enjoyed this film. Senna was a lunatic – any racer or racing fan will tell you that. He drove cars past their limits and seemingly had no fear of coming to a fiery end. He was very much a genuine natural talent at what he did – and sadly didn’t get a chance to do it for as long as he or his fans would have wished. I’m assuming this isn’t a spoiler…
The film is made completely of edited archive footage. Home video, news broadcasts, race footage – you name it, it’s all used in there. Commentary is provided by overdubbed speech from the time or more recent interviews, all in original language with subtitles where required. It is very much a documentary but one which has been edited incredibly well, especially in terms of pace.
Our story opens in the early years, and focuses on Senna’s family life and early start in Formula 1. A large section covers his love/hate/loathe/despise relationship with Alain Prost and his rise to the top of his game.
And then we start to approach that incident. At which point director Asif Kapadia slows the pace down. We start to cover individual days… then hours. We know what’s going to happen. And it’s almost an awful feeling as we can see it looming until it hits. Just like the accident itself, swiftly and suddenly.
The whole move manages to tell a superb story without bogging things down with mawkish interviews. It’s very much seen from a Senna point of view (Prost comes off looking very much the bad guy – deservedly or not, we’ll never know) and some of the footage is incredibly engaging, in particular the scenes from the pre-race drivers’ meetings.
As I said, I’m not a fan of the sport but this is a superb example of a documentary. If the film can make you interested, even if only for a while, in something you’d otherwise not show an interest in… then that’s good film-making.
Plot-in-a-nutshell: a seemingly happily married couple each spend a night out in different cities with a bit of “will (s)he, won’t (s)he” tension around the people they’re with.
See if if you like: being able to leave early to get dinner rather than having to sit through the whole thing.
Dear Grud, what a tedious film. There was about 20 minutes of argumentative whinging between Keira Knightley and Sam Worthington until finally they both go to different nights out – he with a woman from work (Eva Mendes) that Knightley is sure he’s banging, she with an ex that I think she was shagging while they were engaged. Or something. Frankly I’d stopped caring by that point and was spending more time looking at my watch or the insides of my eyelids than the screen.
Honestly, if I had Keira Knightley around I’d still bugger off with someone else if she acted like the spoilt little cow she comes across as in this. It wasn’t enjoyable to watch. Simply frustrating. And slow. And boring. And going nowhere by the 45 minute mark so I gave up and went home.
I came close to walking out of Pirates 4, and wish I had. I didn’t make the same mistake again.