Filmfest!

The Arricam ST, a popular 35 mm film camera cu...
From here to screen

I managed to catch six films in three days this week. I had my reasons. Partly being away for a while meant that I missed a good few releases. Also, I’ve been paying £13.50 a month for a “all you can watch” card which isn’t valid in Vietnam so I had to play catch-up. OK, in the order I saw them:

G-Force (3D)

Nothing to do with Battle of the Planets (I believe that’s being given a separate movie makeover), this is a story about guinea pigs. And a mole. A fly, some cockroaches, a hamster/ferret and three mice also feature. Oh, and a few humans.

Yes, it’s a kid’s film, but a good one with more than decent CGI on the starring rodents. The vocal talent isn’t to be sniffed at, either, though Steve Buscemi completely steals the show with one of the secondary characters.

The plot is simple enough for the youngsters to follow with a wealth of film references for the adults to spot and smirk at. It’s simple, fun and enjoyable – and the 3D is very well done making it worth the extra that’s charged for it.

The Final Destination (3D)

First off, I like the title. The fact that it was obviously going to be the last in the series was one of the draws for me, along with the fact that it was in 3D. I think the first one was the only one I saw at the cinema, the second and third were DVDs. It’s worth seeing at the cinema for the 3D, definitely.

If you’ve seen the earlier films, you know what to expect. A horrible accident (this time at a speedway track) after which someone “wakes up”, freaks out and leaves before it actually happens. The film then follows the now-survivors as death stalks them and kills them in imaginative ways. This is no different to the earlier films. At all. It doesn’t even try. But why mess with what’s worked so well up till now?

The opening credits are fantastic – I loved the “x-ray” view of random accidental killings. Great to see some work going into the credits as they’re so often just a dull segment while you wait for the film to kick in.

Of course, the reason everyone watches these films is for the deaths. There are plenty, it’s fairly gory and a good half of them will make you laugh (or groan) due to the tasteless nature or the bad jokes surrounding them. Also, keep an eye out for some subtle in-jokes in the background. There’s a bus floating around with “108” painted on it – the flight number from the first film. I’m sure that’s not a coincidence.

Randomly, the best bit of 3D is a sticking plaster floating in the swimming pool about halfway through.

If you enjoyed the others in the series, this is a fitting end.

Aliens in the Attic

Yeah, another kids’ film and another that’s not too bad. Decent effects, some good dialogue and a handful of child actors you don’t want to throttle.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: a family goes on holiday to a remote house and the kids discover that a diminutive alien race have decided to use it as a starting point to conquer the earth. It’s up to them to save the planet.

The reason for adults not getting involved is simple and clever and puts the kids at the forefront of the film. There’s a ton of great slapstick including a wonderful kung-fu sequence with a granny. All very silly, but very amusing.

Bandslam

Amazingly, I think the best film I saw this week. Imagine School of Rock without Jack Black (not necessarily a bad thing). This is a very well written film with some incredibly good performances from the young cast. The “battle of the bands” central theme is simply a pole to hang a selection of coming-of-age stories from and, to a large extent, is forgotten about until the film’s climax.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: A young guy and his mother move to a new town where he struggles to make friends at school. He falls in with an ex-cheerleader and a goth, starts to manage a band and they enter a huge local competition opposite the utter favourites. Don’t expect an obvious ending…

I seriously can’t recommend this film highly enough. Kids will love the simpler side of the plot with the character conflict, a bit of slapstick not much) and the utterly kick-ass soundtrack. Adults will appreciate how well-filmed it is, the depth of the characters, the fact that Lisa Kudrow is genuinely excellent as the single mother… and the utterly kick-ass soundtrack.

This film hasn’t done well at the box office and one reason may be that it’s just not been hyped enough. Had it been “Disney’s Bandslam” then it would likely have been a launching pad for a fortune in merchandising with an advertising campaign to match. It would also have been bland, boring, banal and not worth your money. More likely High School Musical: Bandslam instead of a deep, incisive, clever, witty, hugely entertaining piece of cinema.

Oh, and a delightful cameo right at the end.

See it. Please, just go and see it. Give it the recognition it deserves.

The Time Traveller’s Wife

OK, I know this screams “chick flick” with a hint of sci-fi just to trick the guys into seeing it, but it’s a really good film.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: a man with a genetic disorder hops around in time against his will. He meets a young girl in his travels and – eventually – meets her in “real life” and they marry. You could guess that from the title…

Time travel films are always going to be a bit weird and open to paradoxical issues. However, the scripting (and I assume original novel) on this one are very tight indeed. The science part of the story is minimal – he travels. He doesn’t know why and nobody can ever explain it. It just happens, it’s a mystery. Perfect. No technobabble.

What’s important is the character development. On the whole, the film follows the central character but sometimes leaves us with those he befriends as he vanishes for undetermined periods. We get to see the effect his “leaping” has on himself and those around him.

This is a lovely film. A great story, beautifully told and very well acted by all involved. Although a little lengthy, it never drags. Yes, it’s really a chick flick but I still enjoyed it a hell of a lot. Pack tissues though – you’ll need them. Girls, that is!

Funny People

The last film of the blitz and I think the longest. It certainly seemed it. Thing is, it’s not very funny and I don’t recognise most of the people in it – even though a lot appear as themselves. I guess it helps if you know a lot of American stand-ups and sitcom actors.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: a famous comedian discovers he’s got some form of leukaemia and takes on another fledgling comedian to keep him company, write his jokes and the like while he undergoes therapy.

The stand-up sections are painful. They’re simply just not funny. Even the ones fronted by Adam Sandler playing his “famous” character are just lame. I’d be cringing and asking for my money back if I’d paid to get in to those clubs.

None of the characters are really likeable. The acting’s stilted and drags the film down in places. The two child actors are painful to watch. It’s too long. The story goes nowhere and just… ends.

Sandler can act, there’s no doubt about it. This flm proves it, but one way it does that is to show him doing his “silly” act as part of the central character. And it’s awful. You have Sandler, the talented actor, playing Sandler the annoying git with the stupid voices around which his earlier career was founded.

I’d heard great things about this film, but they’re wrong. Just don’t bother. Go and see Bandslam a second time instead.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Inglourious Basterds

Inglourious Basterds
Inglourious Basterds

A new Tarantino film comes along about once every 8 years. That’s a proper “directed by” film rather than a “presented by” or “produced by” where his name’s just used to bring in cash. The problem is, since Pulp Fiction there hasn’t been a single one worth the wait.

Inglourious Basterds continues this theme of disappointment. I thought Kill Bill sucked so much that I didn’t bother seeing part 2 until a friend insisted I watch it on DVD. It was no better. Where Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction used the similar trick of bouncing the story back and forth until the whole became apparent, the following films have been more linear. Instead of clever storytelling, Tarantino’s instead gone for arty cinematography and it just looks pretentious.

As for the trick in IB of using big porn-star lettering everywhere to point out characters… didn’t Guy Ritchie do a better job of that in Lock, Stock… and the like? Slow-motion killings and music that just doesn’t fit or suit the scene add to the mess. For a modern film, it looks positively dated.

The story is linear and quite predictable. There’s no real twist other than you don’t expect things to work out at the end (as ever, trying not to spoiler anything).

Plot-in-a-nutshell: a Jewish American special forces team working in France gets wind of a chance to eradicate Hitler and his cabinet in one fell swoop during a film premier in Paris.

In fairness, there are some excellent performances from the cast. Having the film in German and French, for the most part, lends some kind of authenticity which many action films don’t have. It’s certainly better than the usual “bad accents” school of thought. Sean Connery‘s “Russian” captain in The Hunt For Red October, anyone?

Generally, though, I think I’m the first person I know who’s not really enjoyed it – certainly judging by the Twitter posts I’ve seen over the last week or so. I’m far more excited about the upcoming District 9.

Is it crap? No, not really. I’d definitely go for “overblown and over-hyped and just overall rather disappointing”.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Boat That Rocked

I saw this one on the Etihad flight from Abu Dhabi to Heathrow and it deserves a review all of its own. The Boat That Rocked is a typical UK ensemble comedy with a great cast. A couple of free white wines may have helped, but I was snorting away and laughing out loud at some points; almost in tears at others.

What makes this such a good film – aside from the wealth of acting talent – is the fact that the central plot revolves around something I care about. Freedom of choice, a fight against censorship and the underdog having a good go at an overbearing authority. It’s also got a superb soundtrack, several plot threads and some great segments in the end credits.

Plot in a nutshell: It’s 1966 and rock’n’roll is booming. Except in the UK where the only radio – BBC – plays about 40 minutes per week of popular music. Feeding off the demand, pirate radio stations start up and are an instant hit with the masses… and reviled by the authorities who do all they can to shut them down. The film follows the adventures of the staff on one ship over the course of a year or so until the final closedown of pirate radio by the British government.

Bill Nighy plays Bill Nighy (as he always does) with aplomb, running the ship and the station. Philip Seymor Hoffman is The Count, the headlining American DJ. Nick Frost is the disgusting Dave, Rhys Darby the Kiwi Angus, Rhys Ifans the self-proclaimed king of the airwaves Gavin… and so on. Not a bad actor amongst them. Despite the large number of main parts, nobody gets lost and each character has their own personality.

On the other side of the fence, Kenneth Branagh is nicely slimy minister Dormandy with assistant Twatt (Jack Davenport) toadying to him.

As well as the Good Morning, Vietnam-esque DJ segments and good guy v bad guy plot, there is a lot of romance and bawdy sex (nothing too offensive, though not 100% family friendly by any shot). Nighy’s character has a godson who ends up on the ship after being thrown out of school. He’s our entry into the world of Radio Rock and introduction to the aforementioned characters and lifestyle.

The following two hours are a wonderful mix of highs and lows. Characters don’t always get on – who would living in such cramped quarters? – creating some great conflicts which go right over the top at times.

Of course, the soundtrack is superb being based on the music of the late 60s. The closing montage mentions that “rock and roll had a pretty good 40-or-so-years” flashing up more and more recent album sleeves. However, who on earth decided to include Take That And Party as on a par with the likes of BloodSugarSexMagic and Rattle & Hum needs shot.

Definitely catch this one.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

In-flight films

A380 In-flight entertainment
A telly. On a plane.

Another quick rundown of the flicks I got to see on my last Etihad flights from Bangkok to Heathrow. Just shorties.

First up was Fast & Furious which was pretty good. This is the sequel the first film’s been after for all these years. Don’t get me wrong – 2 Fast 2 Furious was decent enough in a light-hearted way and Tokyo Drift was a half-decent sideways step. But getting the original cast back was the best thing they could have done and this immensely silly bit of car fun is worth the running time.

I then opted for Push which wasn’t quite so good. A nice premise – people with natural superpowers and a government agency trying to improve them by pumping them with drugs… which usually kill them. The superpowers fall under several labels and a lot of the “empowered” try to live off the radar so that the government can’t find them. The story does drag and there are so many holes in the plot that even Swiss cheese would get jealous. Dakota Fanning, though, once again proves she’s a pretty good child actor by not being annoying.

A change of planes and on to The Boat That Rocked which was so good it’s getting a full review (next post).

Final film was Outlander which was nowhere near as good as I was hoping for. Sci fi meets historical fantasy as a spaceship crashes in Viking Norway. Hitching a ride with the humanoid pilot is a rather nasty beastie intent on wiping out anything on two legs. It’s a bit of a mix of The Spaceman and King Arthur, Alien and a Viking Braveheart. Overall not too bad, but it just didn’t flow very well and was fairly predictable.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Brüno

Oh dear. Oh dear, oh dear. I confess I only went to see Brüno as it was the last English-language film on at the cinema that I hadn’t seen. I wasn’t too bothered about it, but it’s cheap here in Bangkok so what the hell.

I want my ninety minutes back.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: gay fashion icon loses his job in Austria so heads to the US to become famous by any means necessary. Side splitting laughs… erm… don’t really ensue.

OK, there were a couple of laughs but overall this was far more cringeworthy than the forerunner Börat. Sacha Baron Cohen has this time targeted the US’s seeming hatred of homosexuality rather than that of semi-Communist outsiders for what’s basically a re-run of the last movie. The thing is, despite the new character it’s an old joke. There’s even a weak companion character who’s almost a mirror of the fat bloke from Börat.

You’re still wondering how, in some scenes, the “innocent” people involved don’t query the existence of a camera/sound team. Couldn’t they have freed the two guys from the cuffs during one scene? Why is that question not even raised?

The high points of the film are – as in the first, very similar outing – the reactions of “real” people to the situations. Primarily the TV studio audience and the crowd at the all-in fighting match at the end. It’s also horribly indicative of the state of affairs in the US today when you see the lengths some people are prepared to go to to get their children a modelling contract.

I actually thing, in parts, the film is more scary than funny. The fact that these people are real, not actors. That PR advisers can have less brain cells than digits on one hand. That Bible-thumpers genuinely think they can “cure” homosexuality. That grown men will weep because they’ve just seen two males kiss. That people will genuinely consider cosmetic surgery for a 2 year-old.

Brüno is more shocking than funny, and it just doesn’t carry its one joke well. Cohen’s had his two shots – I seriously doubt I’ll bother with the next film (which sounds like another version of the same damn idea all over again).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]