Ong Bak: The Beginning

Ong-Bak 2
Ong Bak 2

Tony Jaa is back, and this time you can watch him on the big screen in the UK! Ong Bak: The Beginning is the prequel to the original Ong Bak but aside from the fact that it centres around martial combat it vastly different.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: a young boy sees his parents killed and is spirited away to safety, being raised by a band of renegades. He develops impressive weaponry and fighting skills, then goes to seek revenge for his parents’ deaths.

As well as starring in this film, Jaa also wrote, directed and produced it as well as choreographing all the stunt scenes. This shows in the attention to detail and brutality. However, there the similarity ends between the earlier Ong Bak movie and the last film he did, Tom Yum Goong.

While they were both given a contemporary setting, this third outing for Jaa is set back in the early days of Thailand when most people lived in jungles and territory was fought over by several self-styled “kings”. As such it’s all straw huts, mud and rain rather than skyscrapers and motorways.

The comedy element present in both previous films has also all but vanished. The fight scenes are far more brutal and hard-hitting (in more ways than one) with CGI blood splashes emphasising knife strokes and the like. We’re verging more into Bruce Lee territory than Police Story era Jackie Chan that we’re used to from Jaa.

This has its good sides and down sides. The film isn’t what some people would be expecting, but on the other hand it might surprise a few people who’ve not bothered with the likes of Crouching Dragon, Hidden Tiger due to its more folk-tale storyline.

With the way the story flows – or rather doesn’t as it jumps back and forth in time – it can be a little hard to follow at times. However, once the backstory kicks in, you do get more of a feel for the character. The “twist” ending has been done a million times before in Hollywood, but the action sequences are simply superb. And very brutal.

Lots of bass-heavy thuds as torsos are pummelled and crunching sounds when arms are twisted. It’s not “gross” in its depiction of violence – certainly not compared to the likes of The Punisher – but you can almost feel each punch landing when the speakers in the cinema sound with the report.

There are a couple of fantasy elements with some very bizarre female (I think) combatants who seem to be half-animal. This really steps the film apart from its forebear which was definitely more real-world. If you can class two dozen tuk-tuks falling off a half-completed highway as “real-world”.

Overall, I enjoyed it. I did prefer the first film, mainly due to the humour, but there’s no denying that this is a great piece of martial arts movie-making. Apparently there’s a third Ong Bak due out which will somehow tie the first two together. I think I can see where they’re going after the speech at the end of this one, but I guess we’ll see.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Welcome Sophie!

Artwork on this ball is a common abstract repr...
All smiley!

I was down south this past week (to Londoners, this doesn’t mean I went that far – right now to me anything “south” is latitudinally below Glasgow) and amongst others I caught up with were Chris, Lyds, Lucy and Anna-Louise.

I am overjoyed to announce that Lydia gave birth to a new poppet – Sophie – on Sunday night at around 21:34. She looks utterly gorgeous and the only reason I’m miffed is that she decided to wait until I was back home before she entered the world.

Enormous congratulations to the family and I’m sure she’s in great hands given how lovely her two sisters have turned out!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Are kids’ books just for kids?

I’ve not done much about books recently, and partly that’s down to the fact I’ve not had a lot of spare time to get through the huge pile of novels I want to read. Between (ab)using my cinema pass, studying and this collection of evil electrons called The Internet I’ve let my enjoyment of the written art slip slightly.

The last three books I’ve read have all been part of the same series – the Alex Rider novels by Anthony Horowitz. Yes, they’re “kids'” books but do note that the author has also worked on adult television screenplays and that there is a whole genre of books that didn’t exist when I was younger.

Way back then, shortly after the invention of the printing press, books went from “children’s” to “adult” with no real middle ground. Partly due to the maturity of the Harry Potter content, there is now an enormous collection of books filling that gap. With detailed plots, mature content, interweaving plot strands and characters you can really identify with these books are worth reading by anyone. Simply take a decent “adult” novel, strip out the sex and bad language and a lot of these books could be confused with something for a more mature audience.

The Alex Rider collection are consistently good quality. I’ve not read the Young James Bond novels, but I can’t see them being anywhere near as good as this series, simply as the protagonist doesn’t want to be a spy. The detailed background Horowitz has created means that the character develops as he learns a little more about his past as each book is released. And not all of it is good.

The research given to each title is superb, allowing Horowitz to throw facts at readers and educate them while entertaining at the same time. Everything from how to walk a tightrope to the effects of basic physics on maneuvering in zero gravity have come up in the (so far) seven books. I was surprised to see that Horowitz had met fellow author Stephen Leather (of whom I am also a huge fan) in Bangkok during his research for Snakehead. Leather writes what are, to all intents and purposes, adult Alex Rider books. These are the novels I would say kids would walk right into if they enjoy Alex’s stories.

The fact that I mentioned one of his books (The Long Shot) in a blog post several years ago and received a “thank you” email from him has no influence on how much I like his work. Honestly.

I just ordered another book, Gone by Michael Grant, after I saw it in the children’s section of Waterstones recently.

Don’t miss out on some great reading simply because it’s not in the grown-up’s section of the library or bookshop. See what the teenagers are reading these days and jump on their bandwagons.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Who said metal is for the uneducated?

Well, my parents for two. Anyway, there are numerous reasons to say that this is rubbish – other than the fact that I like it an I iz ded smart, like.

I could point you in the direction of Iron Maiden‘s back catalogue. They’ve got a 13-minute opus based on Samuel Taylor Coleridge‘s Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Alfred Lord Tennyson‘s Charge of the Light Brigade inspired “The Trooper“. Sci-fi is embraced with “To Tame A Land“ (Frank Herbert‘s Dune).

Let’s not forget that singer Bruce Dickinson is (as well as a qualified commercial airline pilot and near-Olympic standard fencer) a history student. As a result, a large number of their songs are about historical events and characters. “Alexander the Great”, “Run To The Hills” (the genocide of the American Indians), “Where Eagles Dare” though based on a film and novel is set during WWII – as is “Aces High”.

Anthrax went for the more simply-titled Indians in their work about the destruction of the native American population. Their song “Among The Living” is based on Stephen King’s novel The Stand. “I Am The Law” is based on literature, though that’s the comic book character Judge Dredd! “Black Lodge” was inspired by David Lynch‘s Twin Peaks and which the series’ score conductor Angelo Badalamenti helped write.

Metallica got in on the act with songs such as “For Whom The Bell Tolls” based on the work of the same name by Ernest Hemingway. Slayer are well known for documenting serial killers and war-related atrocities in their songs. Megadeth have tackled freedom of speech.

These are just well-known examples.

Now, however, I give you something new. To me, anyway. Thanks to Andy for sending me the link to this new way for children to be taught Shakespeare – using the power of MMEETTTAAALLLLL!

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQkzHU_U45s

Enhanced by Zemanta

Film Friday

Spreading the films around this week… today’s serving consisted of horror/thriller Triangle and comedy Couples Retreat.

Triangle

First off, it’s hard to review this one without giving too much away. Suffice to say that the film doesn’t so much have a twist at the end so much as it is, in its entirety, one big twist.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: Six friends go boating and get stranded. A huge ship rescues them, but it seems unpopulated. Bad things then happen. Again and again and again…

It’s a nice short film at around 90 minutes, so it’s punchy. No drawn-out nonsense. Also, once the twist starts to make an appearance the director drops the whole “things jumping out at you” horror schtick to make way for the more interesting story.

To say much more would be to risk spoiling the film. It’s definitely worth watching, even for those not really into “pure” horrors. There aren’t many true horror moments, it definitely is more of a Twilight Zone-esque movie and it’s very well made.

Couples Retreat

Am I alone in thinking this movie’s title really needs an apostrophe? As far as I can tell they’ve inadvertently changed the “Retreat” into verb and the title overall into an order instead of a description of where couples would go to – that being a “Couples’ Retreat”.

Plot-in-a-nutshell: a youngish couple have problems conceiving, their marriage is struggling so they opt to go to a paradise island with some of their friends to try and get over it. Of course, their friends are all couples in various states of relationship issues.

I expected to pretty much hate this film, or at the very least sleep through it as I was knackered. To its credit it actually held my interest for the near 2-hour running time and did actually offer a few decent laughs. It’s no classic, and Vince Vaughn plays the same character he always plays (a nice guy with some issues who, at the end, turns out to be… a nice guy). No surprise given he also co-wrote the film.

There are some moments which, in a less classy film, could end up being squirmy and unwatchable in a Börat or Mr Bean kind of way. However, in this case they’re given just the right amount of screen time and then passed on. The “couple counselling” sessions are just right and none of the characters is too over-the-top, except perhaps Trudy – the 20 year-old girlfriend of a recent divorcée.

In case you’re wondering where it was filmed, you want to hop on a plane to Bora-Bora. Be prepared to fork out around $1300 per night for one of the nicer shacks, though. Urgh.

Worth a watch if there’s nothing else on. Especially The Invention of Lying which this will doubtless be better than as it doesn’t feature Ricky “for crying out loud, just give up – you’re not funny” Gervais. Despite having a cinema pass I’ve still not bothered with that one.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]