Looks like a month for it…

Two posts in a row, two complaints… This one to Blu-Express who were anything but express in getting me from Rome to Nice… 11 hours of delays, no staff available to tell us what was going on and an inability to stick within the EU guidelines enforced since January last year.

Basically, don’t use this mob. I noticed that every flight they had on the board (those that were even displayed) were delayed by at least 2-3 hours.

I am writing to complain about your company’s handling of the delayed flight listed above: flight BV1770 from Rome Fiumicino to Nice on 22nd July 2007. This flight was due to take off at 20:00 on the 22nd. Instead, when I arrived at the airport I was informed that it would be 03:00 on the 23rd.

At some point in the evening, this was changed to 04:30, though nobody thought tell the passengers. The first I knew was when my friend in Nice who was meant to pick me up sent me an SMS. There was no tannoy announcement, and the screens in departure lounge B did not have the flight listed at all.

4:00 came and went before an announcement told us the flight would then be at 06:10. We eventually boarded slightly after 06:30.

Throughout all this, no staff were available to give us any information on what was going on. The airport itself must surely shoulder some of the blame, but the attitude from Blu-Express was one of complete indifference. Your check-in staff packed up and went home shortly after everyone had gone through the security gate and left no presence in the airport whatsoever.

Further, EU Regulation (EC) 261/2004 (available here: http://www.aviationreg.ie/images/ContentBuilder/reg261.pdf) states that staff should provide passengers with written details of their rights in case of a delay or cancellation – article 14(2). I asked both at the check-in desk and the departure gate. No such information was available, so decisions were made by uninformed passengers.

Secondly, for a delay which means the flight departs the next calendar day, the airline is obliged to provide hotel accommodation and transport to / from the hotel (Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c)). I requested this and my request was denied.

Thirdly, I asked how I was supposed to contact my friend in Nice who would be awaiting my arrival. I was told that payphones were available or I could use a coin-operated internet terminal. I am legally entitled to two telephone calls, faxes, telexes or emails paid for by your company which I was denied. This is a direct contravention of the Regulation (Article 9(2)).

We were offered and given an evening meal of satisfactory quality. The airport gave us water at around 4am. However, no breakfast was given – not acceptable given the length of time between the evening meal and the actual take-off (Article 9(1)(a)).

I had to make a phone call to France at a payphone which cost me a small fortune. This cost should have been borne by your company. I should have been provided with food, but was not. Given the delay in flight time, I should have been offered a hotel bed and transport there and back – but was not.

In all, your company made a “half-assed’ effort to try to claim it was doing all it legally had to. Sadly, even in this it failed. You did less than the legal minimum and for that I seek and demand some form of compensation. Had you actually satisfied all the terms laid out in the aforementioned Regulation I would not be writing this mail, but you did not. As a result of your ineptitude and uncaring attitude, I effectively lost a whole day of my holiday in Nice – half of it stuck in an airport in Rome to which I will also be complaining, and half of it asleep from exhaustion as there is nowhere to sleep in the airport.

I will, however, be fair and leave it to you to decide a suitable amount of compensation. Rest assured, if the amount is unsatisfactory I will be taking this complaint further to the relevant administrative body in Italy from where you can certainly expect to recieve a hefty financial penalty.

Email is the best way to contact me at present, though if you prefer a land address then please ask and I will be glad to forward one on to you.

Yours faithfully,

etc

Overdrawn! Twice!

And it’s not my fault, honest! Well, perhaps only for forgetting I’d already set a transaction up – but when faced with an account screen which tells me that no such transaction has been set up it’s kind of understandable that I went ahead and kicked another one off. My email to LLoydsTSB (which could make more sense but I was in a rush as a cybercafe in Rome):

I have noticed that I recently went overdrawn due to the information on my online banking page not being up to date. I checked my account around the 16th of the month as I wasn’t sure if I’d set up a transfer of cash to pay off a credit card. Upon looking at the “transfers and balances” page, there was no information regarding such a transfer so I set up another, moving money from one account to a different one and from that to the credit card.

I just checked my credit card statement today – I paid the bill *twice* as I *had* set up a one-off payment from the Lloyds account. The end result is I went overdrawn with both yourselves and the Nationwide as I had to get the cash onto the card quickly and the credit card is held with them.

Had the information on the online banking page been correct, I would not have found myself in this situation. At the time I looked, I can only assume that the money had been “reserved” in my account for a transaction I had set up for an earlier date (allowing for the 3-4 days these transfers take, which nobody can explain). At that date, as the transaction had commenced, the details were wiped from my Transfers and Payments list, but the money left in my account. There was therefore no indication that almost UK400 was due to drop out of my account. I then set up another transaction to move the sum to the Nationwide to cover the sum I thought I then had to move from there.

A week later I check and two debits have been made, my card has been paid twice (I’m now in credit on the thing) and I’m overdrawn with yourselves (which I didn’t expect) and with Nationwide (which I did, but as it turns out I didn’t need to be).

Had your system not deleted the details before the transaction was completed I would not have found myself in this situation. I should have still been comformatbly in credit. I have just started another transaction from my savings account to rectify this and am currently almost UK400 “out of pocket” as it’s sat on my credit card earning no interest.

As such, I would expect the least you could do would be to ensure I don’t incur any charges for that. At most, I would hope someone would look at your system to ensure that future transactions are not erased from view in the system until the money involved has actually *moved*.

I mean, we all know banks try to screw you by taking 3-4 days to shift money (unless you’re moving it between accounts within the same bank) but to start the movement off, leave the money where it is and then delete the visible record that such a transaction is taking place is bound to lead to confusion, isn’t it?

Avoid Cardif Pinnacle

Another crappy company to warn you of. My otherwise excellent Nationwide gold card comes with free insurance on purchases underwritten by Cardif Pinnacle. Thing is, unlike Nationwide who I’ve pretty much decided are the best bank ever, CP are complete *****.

As those reading my Tour Blog may be aware, I lost my nice new Olympus camera in a river a couple of weeks ago. Yes, I’m a ****. But the insurance covers me for loss, damage and theft.

After digging for ages I found a contact email address on their web page which I promptly sent a message to. Ringing them from Laos wasn’t really an option! Between time difference and expense it wasn’t going to happen.

An auto-response came back promising a “real” reply within 24 hours.

*tick* 24 hours *tick* 48 *tick* 72…

After a week, I emailed them again. Then again. Then again.

**** all. Useless ****-tards.

I emailed Nationwide instead and had a reply within three days. Then I found out I’m only covered for 100 days after the purchase anyway. Arse. So admittedly receiving a reply would have been fruitless anyway but that’s not the point. If they can’t reply to a mail, how can they be expected to do anything else properly?

Cardif Pinnacle (and yes – one “f” in Cardif) are the most recent winners of the “Don’t Touch This Useless Bunch Of ******* With A Bargepole” award. Pricks.

Bovril in factual cockup shock horror

I read the following on NUFC.com‘s Coxy’s Corner. Bovril (a meat-based hot drink from the UK) is putting little factoids on the back of current jars. One of them was the following:

“In 1994 enough Bovril drink was made to fill 90 million match day mugs.

In the same year Andy Cole became the highest ever premiership scorer with 34 goals in a season for Manchester United.”

Errr, that’ll be Newcastle United actually. Close, but no steaming hot mug of meaty-smelling beverage for the guy in the research department.

Me being me, I emailed Unilever who make Bovril. Sorry to say I don’t have a copy of that mail as it was on a web form. I am pleasantly surprised, though, to say that they replied:

“Bovril CaseID#38225#

Hello from Bovril

Dear Iain

Thank you for your email.

Well done on spotting our deliberate mistake, I have passed your comments
on to the brand managers concerned.

Kind Regards

Barbara Westwood
Consumer Advisor”

Well done to Unilver for at least making the effort to send me a message back! Let’s see if they recall all the offending jars…